{"id":924,"date":"2020-12-15T00:37:02","date_gmt":"2020-12-15T00:37:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/?p=924"},"modified":"2020-12-15T00:37:02","modified_gmt":"2020-12-15T00:37:02","slug":"aco-comments-on-weber-and-young-development-to-heritage-kitchener","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/uncategorized\/aco-comments-on-weber-and-young-development-to-heritage-kitchener\/","title":{"rendered":"ACO Comments on Weber and Young Development to Heritage Kitchener"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/50-52-Weber-Street-West-Kitchener-Gail-Pool-1-scaled.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-930\" src=\"https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/50-52-Weber-Street-West-Kitchener-Gail-Pool-1-scaled.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"2560\" height=\"1240\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/50-52-Weber-Street-West-Kitchener-Gail-Pool-1-scaled.jpg 2560w, https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/50-52-Weber-Street-West-Kitchener-Gail-Pool-1-300x145.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/50-52-Weber-Street-West-Kitchener-Gail-Pool-1-1024x496.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/50-52-Weber-Street-West-Kitchener-Gail-Pool-1-768x372.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/50-52-Weber-Street-West-Kitchener-Gail-Pool-1-1536x744.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/50-52-Weber-Street-West-Kitchener-Gail-Pool-1-2048x992.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 2560px) 100vw, 2560px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>John Motz House, 56 Weber Street West (left) and 52 Weber Street West, Kitchener<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/107-Young-Street-Kitchener-August-22-2018-Gail-Pool-scaled.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-929\" src=\"https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/107-Young-Street-Kitchener-August-22-2018-Gail-Pool-scaled.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"2560\" height=\"1707\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/107-Young-Street-Kitchener-August-22-2018-Gail-Pool-scaled.jpg 2560w, https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/107-Young-Street-Kitchener-August-22-2018-Gail-Pool-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/107-Young-Street-Kitchener-August-22-2018-Gail-Pool-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/107-Young-Street-Kitchener-August-22-2018-Gail-Pool-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/107-Young-Street-Kitchener-August-22-2018-Gail-Pool-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/107-Young-Street-Kitchener-August-22-2018-Gail-Pool-2048x1366.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 2560px) 100vw, 2560px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>107 Young Street, Kitchener<\/p>\n<p><strong>Background<\/strong>:\u00a0 The development for a medium rise building at the corner of Weber and Young was proposed in 2018 (see above photos).\u00a0 At first, the proposal was to demolish three buildings.\u00a0 Each had significant heritage attributes and historical contextual value.\u00a0 Following opposition to the plan by ACO NWR and others, the proposal was changed so that the Weber Street properties were to be demolished and the Young Street property was to be temporarily moved and returned to the site.\u00a0 Record articles are <a href=\"https:\/\/www.therecord.com\/\/news\/waterloo-region\/2018\/08\/14\/heritage-backers-want-to-stop-demolition.html\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.therecord.com\/\/news\/waterloo-region\/2020\/02\/04\/kitchener-development-would-demolish-heritage-homes-to-make-way-for-innovative-seniors-housing.html\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>These properties are inside the Civic Centre Heritage Conservation District.\u00a0 They also have significant heritage attributes.\u00a0 In addition, 56 Weber was the home of Kitchener Mayor <a href=\"https:\/\/generations.regionofwaterloo.ca\/getperson.php?personID=I30658&amp;tree=generations\">John Motz<\/a> (1830-1911) who was also a sheriff and the publisher of the <em>Berliner Journal<\/em>, precursor of the <em>Waterloo Record<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>The development was approved by Council on August 4, 2020, subject to a number of conditions.<\/p>\n<p>Below is the written text of the last submission by ACO NWR at the August 4th\u00a0 meeting.<\/p>\n<p>________________<\/p>\n<p><strong>SUBMISSION: Heritage Kitchener Meeting &#8211; Monday, August 4, <\/strong><strong>2020<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>RE: HPA-2020-V-001 &amp; HPA-2020-V-002 &#8211; request to demolish protected heritage buildings in the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Architectural Conservancy of Ontario (ACO) North Waterloo Region branch would like to share a few thoughts on the Heritage Permit Applications being discussed for the proposed demolition of the two buildings at 50-52 Weber St W and 56 Weber St W.<\/p>\n<p><strong>ACO is opposed to the demolition or irreversible alteration to those buildings which our community has already chosen to protect. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>When City Council considered the demolition of two homes next to Schneider Haus in 2017, they assured us that this \u201cshould not be considered as a <strong>precedent<\/strong> for the demolition of other homes in approved heritage districts.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In 2018, council <strong>refused<\/strong> the demolition of two historic buildings on Queen St S.<\/p>\n<p>In her memo about this project, Senior Heritage Planner Michelle Drake laid out in <strong>very strong<\/strong> language her \u201csignificant concerns with the proposed demolitions.\u201d\u00a0 She cited \u201cthe clear goals, policies and guidelines within the [District] Plan, which strongly discourage demolition.\u201d\u00a0 She went on to state, the \u201cPlan requires that protection, retention and adaptive reuse of existing buildings be given priority over redevelopment.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Heritage Conservation Districts (HCD) are created after much consultation with area residents, plus expertise from City planning staff and paid consultants.\u00a0 <strong>Boundaries are carefully and thoughtfully delineated<\/strong> to preserve our built heritage and provide stability for an area deemed worth protecting, often one thought to be under threat in future.<\/p>\n<p>The Civic Centre Neighbourhood HCD is of significant cultural heritage value given the heritage attributes found within its architecture, streetscape and historical associations.\u00a0 The designation of the Civic Centre Neighbourhood as a HCD was <strong>meant to protect and preserve the heritage assets and character that exist in the area<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>When proposals come forward that could destroy the very thing that Districts were meant to protect, area residents have good reason to wonder about the future of their neighbourhood.\u00a0 It has the result of introducing instability into an area.\u00a0 This negatively affects neighbouring properties, <strong>creating a domino effect<\/strong>, reaching well beyond the boundaries of the redeveloped property.<\/p>\n<p>Local, Regional and Provincial Policy <strong>discourage<\/strong> <strong>demolition<\/strong> of protected heritage properties:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>each of these buildings is already designated under the <em>Ontario Heritage Act<\/em><\/li>\n<li>the <em>Planning Act<\/em>, <em>Provincial Policy Statement<\/em>, <em>Ontario Heritage Toolkit<\/em>, and the <em>Official Plans<\/em> of both the Region of Waterloo and the City of Kitchener all agree \u2013 that cultural heritage resources <strong>are to be conserved<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The City\u2019s Zoning By-law, REINS, PARTS and the proposed Secondary Plan all suggest that <strong>possible<\/strong> future uses of these properties could be more intensive than\u00a0what\u2019s there now.\u00a0 But the District Plan is clear in saying: \u201cThere may be rare occasions where infill development or limited integrated redevelopment is possible in the future [and this project is neither infill nor integrated] or where redevelopment is required due to loss of buildings through fire, severe structural decay, etc.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">All of these documents have been designed <strong>in case<\/strong> these \u201ccatastrophic events\u201d occur, to give flexibility so that appropriate rebuilding can take place, not the other way around, <strong>not specifically to allow redevelopment<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>These HCD properties were <strong>purchased solely for the purpose of redevelopment<\/strong>, which explains why, in the years they have been owned by the current developer, no improvements and little maintenance have been carried out.\u00a0 Tacoma Engineers advises that both buildings are structurally sound and in good condition.\u00a0 While limited localized deficiencies were found, the assessment suggests they can likely be resolved with routine maintenance and\/or minor restoration effort.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Nothing \u201ccatastrophic,\u201d just simple neglect. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Does it make sense to demolish Group B and C buildings within a protected Heritage Conservation District to construct a Group D, eight-storey building, one that contributes nothing to the heritage character of the district?\u00a0 We think not.<\/p>\n<p>The possible approval of these heritage permit applications is a dangerous <strong>precedent<\/strong>, indicating to developers that it\u2019s open season on heritage properties in Kitchener.\u00a0 This is a good time to send the message that our built heritage must be protected.<\/p>\n<p>Kitchener has over 65,000 individual properties, but only 230 are Listed on the Municipal Heritage Register, just over 1,000 are located in Heritage Conservation Districts and fewer than 90 are Individually Designated under Part IV of the <em>Ontario Heritage<\/em> <em>Act<\/em>.\u00a0 Many of these properties are threatened with redevelopment.\u00a0 <strong>It is a limited resource that is gradually being lost.<\/strong>\u00a0 Help us protect the few resources we have.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s the <strong>mandate of Heritage Kitchener<\/strong> to be the voice for the protection of our built heritage.\u00a0 You have an opportunity here: <strong>take a stand<\/strong> and recommend council refuse the Heritage Permit Applications for the demolition of 50-52 Weber St W and 56 Weber St W.<\/p>\n<p>Who are we?\u00a0 Through advocacy and direct action, the Architectural Conservancy of Ontario has been a leader in preserving Ontario\u2019s architectural and environmental heritage since 1933, with 20 branches currently operating in the province.\u00a0 The local ACO North Waterloo Region branch, formed in 1980, encourages the conservation and re-use of structures, districts and landscapes of architectural, historical and cultural significance through education and advocacy.\u00a0 We speak on behalf of about 100 local members in the communities of Kitchener, Waterloo, Wellesley, Wilmot and Woolwich.<\/p>\n<p>Thank you for your consideration,<\/p>\n<p>Marg Rowell<\/p>\n<p>President, ACO NWR<\/p>\n<p>Submitted electronically:\u00a0 Monday, July 27, 2020<\/p>\n<p>From: aco.nwrb@gmail.com<\/p>\n<p>To: Dianna Saunderson, Committee Administrator, dianna.saunderson@kitchener.ca Cc: Councillor Sarah Marsh, sarah.marsh@kitchener.ca<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; John Motz House, 56 Weber Street West (left) and 52 Weber Street West, Kitchener 107 Young Street, Kitchener Background:\u00a0 The development for a medium rise building at the corner of Weber and Young was proposed in 2018 (see above photos).\u00a0 At first, the proposal was to demolish three buildings.\u00a0 Each had significant heritage attributes &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/uncategorized\/aco-comments-on-weber-and-young-development-to-heritage-kitchener\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">ACO Comments on Weber and Young Development to Heritage Kitchener<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-924","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/924","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=924"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/924\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":931,"href":"https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/924\/revisions\/931"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=924"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=924"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aconwr.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=924"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}